Thank you @Bimodal_user, I am really talking about an UP (Ultra Power) or a SP (Super Power) BTE, but something similar with tubing, would indeed be brilliant! I believe at the moment, UP RIC’s only go up to 105db, and for some, that isn’t enough… Cheers Kev 
3 Likes
Probably just enough to tease.
WH
2 Likes
I knew that, but I thought it was interesting 
However, seriously, last time I was really worried about the HA industry drive to make smaller and smaller RICs/BTE at the expense of e.g. battery life.
2 Likes
What’s most interesting to me with the Sphere is the potential that AI could represent the first meaningful step change in hearing aid technology in a long time.
When I first started wearing analog HAs, my audi adjusted the gain of each channel manually with a small screwdriver. The big step change after that was digital. The ability to have significantly more channels—each individually controlled—was a drastic improvement in speech intelligibility.
But since the transition from analog to digital, the improvements have seemed to be more incremental. Directional microphones, auto program switching, Bluetooth, improvements to noise reduction algorithms, rechargability… they are quality of life improvements, but none has matched the jump from analog to digital.
I’m going to be very interested to see if AI will be on par with the jump from analog to digital. I suspect it will be in the long run, but TBD on how much that is realized in the Sphere. I hope to get to try them out in a few weeks…
3 Likes
Knowing nothing about MEMS except what this article posted by @Bimodal_user reports, it would seem to me that this new technology could be easily provided for existing BTE HAs by just replacing their receivers and not requiring an entirely new HA. Am I missing something?
Yes, because:
-
Recent BA (balanced armature) receivers technology is proven.
-
Production lines are accomodated for recent BA receivers.
-
Manufacturers’ orders and commitments.
-
Amortization of R&D and production lines cost.
-
Cost of licences for xMEMS? (probably)
-
Reportedly still excess energy consumption by xMEMS.
1 Like
You assume the electrical drivers for the receivers are compatible. The might have radically different voltage/current characteristics, how sensitive the device is to the power applied. There is some possibility it would work, but I would be surprised.
WH
2 Likes
@ryanb
Your comment is really helpful.
I’ve used hearing aids for 20 or so years.
When I received my Phonak Audeo Paradise P90R’s I was very grateful. However, battery life was really awful. Setup was worse.
For my last two sets of Phonaks I thought the key to hearing better was to turn up the volume. This set of Paradise P90R’s were defective. They’ve been replaced. The setup was awful. I thought we had all fallen into a rabbit hole with directional microphones, auto program switching, bluetooth and noise reduction. All were caused by the dispenser who had not set them up properly.
When I have trouble hearing I change the waxguards in my 4.0 Power Receivers. It always helps, but only for 4 or 5 days. Then I change them again. I’ve been promised new 5.0 Receivers. They’re long overdue. Please Phonak Canada–I need 5.0 power receivers.
Sincerely,
DaveL
edit: I’ve always had my ears checked when I visit my audiologist or hearing instrument specialist. they have all said my ears were clean, with no wax buildup.
2 Likes
I work in tech and deal with AI on a daily basis. I truly believe we are just in the beginning of an exponential growth pattern of AI driven platforms. I think over the next decade, we’re going to see massive leaps in processing power for hearing aids and other devices. You can take a look at what companies like Nvidia are doing with using AI to generate entire frames and upscaling to put out 4k video at high frame rates for a fraction of the cost. They also have AI tools that completely remove background noise from calls (both incoming and outgoing noise). You can literally have a lawn mower in the room with you and the person on the other side would never know.
Right now a bottle neck is simply power consumption (as we’re seeing with this first gen product from Phonak). But chips continue to get smaller and power requirements continue to get lower. I for one want to support this growth and have a trial tomorrow for the Spheres with the full intention of buying them if they’re half as good as the video examples that are out.
But to your point, I think we’re starting to see a major shift in the industry and the end result for all of us should be significantly better noise reduction in these coming years!
5 Likes
One of the audiologists talks about his own impressions of wearing Phonak Audeo Sphere, his experiences in different hearing conditions.
2 Likes
Hey Greg,
Just curious if you are letting your hearing aids run in auto mode, or are you manually adjusting based upon the environment?
Thanks for feedback!
When you say AI noise reduction use, do you have to manually turn it on, or can you let it decide auto?
Thanks for feedback! I’ll be getting my Spheres to trial in about 2 weeks, too.
I guess I’m a little more skeptical of how rapidly this is going to develop. I think the main way to deal with the power issue is going to be using a smaller process size. Hearing aid manufacturers have tended to use much bigger process sizes than smartphones, presumably because of cost. Finding process size info on hearing aids is challenging, but Phonak was groundbreaking with their Sword Chip when they lowered it to 28nM from 65nM. At the time, phone process size was around 5-7nM. From what I gather, it is tremendously expensive to develop chips on very small processes. Smart Phone manufacturers deal in enough volume to make it profitable. I’m not sure about HA manufacturers. Hope I’m wrong.
3 Likes
I am guessing the accelerometer is key for the algorithms to guess/anticipate that you are trying to listen to a different target, and adjust who/what direction to amplify. I don’t think they’ll be dumping that, they’d rather continue to improve the utilization of the accelerometer, otherwise they are just putting all your eggs on battery life & streaming. You might aswell just get disposable battery hearing aids at that point, because I think the algorithms will lose their efficacy to the point that it isn’t useful.
So I see there is a 3 hour AI limit, which is probably fine, since we likely don’t find ourselves in a very loud environment requiring good speech clarity for much more than that.
Just wondering how much battery life this hearing aid has after you use up those 3 hours? Lets assume usual autosensing & listening & occasional loud environment is taking place, minus streaming?
Now how about you use 3 hours of AI, and you’re streaming a lot. How much can you stream before the battery dies?
Those are the big questions for me. I don’t mind charging every night, I am in the habit of daily charging my phone and compilot anyways.
Somewhere in this thread it was mentioned you don’t have to limit to 3 hours and the battery life was mentioned 12 hours I think.
I heard that Automatic Spheric Speech Clarity kicks in when the noise level is > 69 dB.
I am disappointed that Phonak did not provide such information about when a particular program from AutoSense OS is switched on.
See other two topics:
and:
3 Likes
That’s very helpful thanks.
I’ve never used myPhonak app, I don’t have a new enough HA.
I am wondering if the app allows me to program enable/disable sphere by tapping button on HAs 2 or 3 times or something like that? Autosense works wonders enough for me 80-90% of noisy situations, so I might just be selective with AI when autosense isn’t sufficient.
I’ll know in 2 weeks! Haha