I think possibly a custom rechargeable as well (but in the lumity line). BUT, phonak is being tight lipped and now right at the end I’m wondering if I got my hopes up higher than called for and will be brutally disappointed.
But no, I know it’s a new RIC at the very least. And they are pushing hard on the launch, seem to be spending money. I think THEY think they’ve got something good this round.
I am grateful I have the Phonak Audeo Paradise P90Rs. I’m 2+ years away from getting my next hearing aids through workman’s compensation. I’m confident that Phonak will have even better RIC hearing aids by then. I hope that my hearing is not much worse by then, or I’ll need the Nadia? hearing aids (BTE)
Is there any reason a new aid could not support Bluetooth classic and Auracast? It’s likely not either or but it would need to be updated to a newer Bluetooth version.
I think devices like phones and laptops tend to have backwards compatibility. I’m unaware of any hearings aids having that capability as of yet. Yes it’s theoretically possible to have both BT Classic and Auracast but there is limited space to cram the electronics in. To best of my knowledge, Phonak (Sonova) is the only one to support Bluetooth Classic. Other major brands are either using LE Audio or other BT LE solutions (Made for iPhone and ASHA)
I’m no techie, but I would anticipate connection issues if both Classic Bluetooth and LE Auracast are on the same aids. I’m not even sure all the bugs have been worked out with aids having ONLY LE Auracast on them. I had to return the new Oticon Intent aids cuz they simply would never reliably stay connected to my Android Samsung Flip4 phone.
That Paris clip above -if this is real-time audio processing that HAs can do, not playing with the microphones- is extremely impressive. Now where I live, in the quiet suburbs, there is not much traffic. Would be nice to have other examples with other types of noise, like someone sitting in a busy bar, background music. Sound clips are far more informative than those sleek marketing videos. But why do we see (hear) this on LinkedIn and Fakebook rather than on the company website?
This conversation suggests the noise reduction concerns speech vs non-speech noise (only):
I am still not sure if this is truly achieved by “IA on a chip”. IA sounds a bit like the “fuzzy logic” hype a couple of decades ago… While its application to produce far superior chess and go software is crystal-clear, whether all electronics from toasters onward will now improve is unclear to me.