This is only my second post and is specific to my particular audiometry which is almost identical to Joe Duffer’s, however mine does drop off a little more than his above 1k Hz and I’ll also throw tinnitus into the mix. From what I’ve been able to find I believe that this type profile lends itself very well to open fit type HA’s due to being able to hear well at the lower frequencies but then falling off noticeably as we get into the higher frequencies.
I tried the Agil Pro’s with a open fit for a week and they worked pretty good for me. I’m not convinced that the cost of them is justified so I’ve got some Verite’s that I’ll be getting next week.
One of the big pluses I see in the Bernafon Verite’s over the Agil Pro’s is the processing delay. With the channelfree of the Verite it appears that max delay for sound processing is about 2 ms (milliseconds) where it is higher in multichannel HA’s like the Agil. From what I can find on the internet it sounds like the more channels you have in a HA the more circuit delay there is to do the channel separation, channel processing and then to merge it back to the sound delivered from the HA. When you get above a 5 ms delay with a open fit type HA you begin to have problems with timing of un-processed signals vs the processed signal.
It seems that for audiometry along the lines of mine and Joe Duffers that a open fit type RIC works well because we still have fairly good hearing at or below 1k Hz and then have big drops above 1k Hz. With the Verite’s I’m guessing that the reduced delay in the electronics will be a big plus over the signal processing delay in the Agil Pro’s I tried. From what I found on the internet this reduced processing delay of the Verite paired with the “right audiometry” should give me a very good result in almost all listening conditions.
I’ll post back after I get the Verite’s and have had a few days with them. This should be in a couple of weeks since I won’t get them until the 21st of July.