You are posting to a thread dormant for 8 years. We may never know how zoo_girl made out. However the point is perennial.
I had not heard of ADRO. The basic papers go back to 1999 and 2005, as examples. To my mind, it is similar to work done at CBS Labs around 1960 for military intercom and broadcast level controls. They were 1 channel and bigger than a breadbox (early ones used vacuum tubes). The sliding window gain decision algorithm (and general build) was SO much better than others that it dominated most of 1960s broadcast level boxes, until even newer companies made still more complex level-pushers for a hot radio broadcast market.
So ADRO is a different way to manage gain in a changing world. In hand-wired logic it is a “window comparator”. In a DSP it is about 3 lines of code.
I, IMHO, don’t see how ADRO differs from so-called WDRC in how it can use multiple “channels”. These are usually understood to be frequency bands. Since speech appears as narrow-band sound at different frequencies, it seems logical we may want to handle narrow frequency bands. Certainly when adjusting sound systems 2 knobs was better than none, and 10 better yet. Octave, 1/3rd Oct, and 1/6th Oct freq-band boxes have been useful. But even in high buck systems the 1/3rd Oct is most popular because of masking. In hearing aids we also have the ratty response of the receiver, and the rattiness of ears like mine, plus now considerable automation of adjustments in-use. 20 or 40 bands makes acoustic sense. Binary digital likes numbers like 16 32 64 and these are loudly touted as something to pay more for.
I had not heard of Lucid, the website is here. Like ALL aid marketers, the topic is too complicated for most customers to comprehend, so they must resort to telling us: “quality that is superior …hear the sounds that are most important…understandable and comfortable…smoother, richer sound…greater sound clarity…focus the most important part of the sound…experience a very positive difference.” Probably all true, and all this verbiage sounds a lot like brand P or W or B’s pages.