๐๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐ก๐๐ ๐ ๐ก๐๐๐ซ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ญ๐๐ฌ๐ญ ๐ข๐ง ๐๐ฉ๐๐๐ฌ๐๐ฏ๐๐ซ๐ฌ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ฐ๐๐ง๐ญ๐๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ซ๐๐ฉ๐จ๐ซ๐ญ ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ญ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ก๐๐๐ซ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ญ๐๐ฌ๐ญ ๐๐ฉ๐ฉ ๐๐ซ๐จ๐ฆ ๐๐๐ญ๐ซ๐๐ฅ๐๐ฑ ๐ ๐๐ฏ๐ ๐ซ๐จ๐ฎ๐ ๐ก๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐ฌ๐ข๐ฆ๐ข๐ฅ๐๐ซ ๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ญ๐ฌ
Do you have the side by side results?
Was the Specsavers test done with headphones or inserts?
Hm, if you are referring to the audiograms you posted in the other thread (New member here - audiogram), I would call the audiogram currently in your profile massively different. Just to pick out one example: 45 dB or 65 dB hearing threshold at 4K (left ear) is a pretty big deal when programming hearing aids. Itโs the calibration/baseline problem. Itโs hard to overcome with just standard audio equipment.
๐๐ก, ๐ฒ๐๐ฌ, ๐ข ๐ญ๐ซ๐ข๐๐ ๐ญ๐ฐ๐จ ๐ก๐๐๐ซ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ญ๐๐ฌ๐ญ ๐๐ฉ๐ฉ๐ฌ, ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐ฎ๐๐ข๐จ๐ฅ๐จ๐ ๐ข๐๐ ๐จ๐ง๐ ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ญ ๐ข ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ๐๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ญ๐ฌ ๐จ๐ ๐๐ซ๐จ๐ฆ ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐
๐๐ก๐ ๐๐๐ญ๐ซ๐๐๐ฑ ๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ญ๐ฌ ๐๐ซ๐ ๐ก๐๐ซ๐ ๐ฐ๐ก๐ข๐๐ก ๐ฐ๐๐ฌ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ ๐ฐ๐ข๐ญ๐ก ๐๐จ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐๐ซ ๐๐๐ซ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง ๐ ๐ช๐ฎ๐ข๐๐ญ(๐ข๐ฌ๐ก) ๐ซ๐จ๐จ๐ฆ
Your personal audiogram (as taken on 08 Jul 2025) (1).pdf (162.6 ๐๐)
๐๐ฌ ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ ๐๐๐ง ๐ฌ๐๐ ๐ข๐ญ ๐ง๐๐ข๐ฅ๐๐ ๐ฆ๐ฒ ๐ก๐๐๐ซ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ฅ๐จ๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐๐ญ ๐ก๐ข๐ ๐ก ๐๐ซ๐๐ช๐ฌ ๐ฉ๐ซ๐๐ญ๐ญ๐ฒ ๐ฐ๐๐ฅ๐ฅ, ๐๐ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ ๐๐ข๐ญ ๐จ๐๐. ๐๐ญ๐ฐ, ๐ขโ๐ฆ ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐จ๐๐๐ ๐จ๐ง ๐ฆ๐ฒ ๐๐๐ซ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฌ ๐๐ฌ ๐ข ๐๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ฅ๐๐๐ซ๐๐ซ ๐ฐ๐ก๐๐ง ๐ฅ๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐๐ง๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ฆ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ข๐
๐๐ฒ ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ ๐๐ฎ๐๐ข๐จ๐ ๐ซ๐๐ฆ ๐ฐ๐๐ฌ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ ๐ฐ๐ข๐ญ๐ก ๐ก๐๐๐๐ฉ๐ก๐จ๐ง๐๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง ๐ ๐ฌ๐จ๐ฎ๐ง๐ ๐๐จ๐จ๐ญ๐ก ๐๐ญ ๐๐ฉ๐๐๐ฌ๐๐ฏ๐๐ซ๐ฌ
Sorry thatโs miles out, look at the 2 KHz area on the left ear; which is a critical area for speech understanding. According to the PDF you have a degree of asymmetry there which isnโt evident on the Specsavers test. Thatโs a really erroneous basis to establish a hearing prescription.
๐๐๐ฌ, ๐ญ๐ก๐ 2๐ค๐๐ณ ๐ซ๐๐๐๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฏ๐๐ซ๐ฒ ๐๐ข๐๐๐๐ซ๐๐ง๐ญ ๐๐๐ญ๐ฐ๐๐๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ฌ๐ ๐๐ฎ๐๐ข๐จ๐ ๐ซ๐๐ฆ๐ฌ - ๐ข๐ฆ ๐ ๐จ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐จ ๐๐จ๐ญ๐ก ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐จ๐ง๐ฅ๐ข๐ง๐ & ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐๐๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐ก๐๐๐ซ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ญ๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐ฌ ๐๐ ๐๐ข๐ง ๐๐ฌ ๐ ๐๐จ๐ฎ๐๐ฅ๐ ๐๐ก๐๐๐ค - ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐จ๐ง๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐๐จ๐จ๐ญ๐ฌ