Haven’t read up on MFI, but Android ASHA has the basic bandwidth “at the expense of latency” (which I do not experience with TV Connector), but is CoC-based (“Connection Oriented Channel”), like a point-to-point TCP/IP socket. It does not support one-to-many broadcast transmission that the TV Connector supports.
In engineering we consider all the details. I just can’t draw conclusions from abstractions. I could still be mistaken, but all the evidence I’ve seen is to the contrary about the TV Connector and BLE.
And regarding the BT Symbol, show me where it says use of that symbol requires that the FCC Cert is for a strict BT profile or BLE GATT profile and those profiles only. FCC certs are for radiation levels, bandwidth occupation (in the case of frequency-hopping), and sideband emissions (part of radiation levels). They don’t certify or care about protocols.
I concede that the TV connector could use BLE GATT profiles for signalling. Perhaps this is what the Bluetooth symbol is for. But not for audio with one-to-many capability.