That page’s target audience doesn’t have to understand it because they’re not part of the discussion on this thread here so how they understand it is irrelevant to THIS discussion in THIS context. But you’re a participant in THIS discussion, and I thought it was clear that everyone has been talking about the sound SIGNATURE, and NOT counting in how the technologies like noise management and other automatic features affect the sound QUALITY.
You can see the 2 quotes below where both MDB and Neville discounted the effect of the technologies on the sound quality as NOT being part of what is being discussed, the sound SIGNATURE. Then even in my quote, I also discounted the technologies as well in the third quote below.
I’ve already clarified enough that we’re talking about 2 different things, the sound signature and the sound quality. But if somebody continues to want to choose to be willfully ignorant of this distinction for an ulterior motive, other than participating in an intelligent discussion, then that’s OK, too. The distinction still matters to plenty of those who truly want to understand.