I guess the question here is whether there is value in linking the REM adjustments done from P1 to MyMusic/HifiMusic to reflect the acoustical shortfalls (that might have been caused by something like a large ear canal or whatever else it is) or not.
Obviously for @withoutwings , it’s a negative/undesired thing to him. I’m guessing that the formulation of the MyMusic rationale is way too different from the other speech-oriented or general-situation-oriented rationales (be them standard or proprietary) that the REM changes might have caused radical changes to MyMusic/HifiMusic, but not as radical changes to the other rationales.
In theory, doing REM on the music program like @Neville advocates, to make up for the acoustical abnormality that might exist in the whole acoustical system, makes sense in theory; although with the caviat that the music formula is not available on third party REM equipment, but only if it’s not too different than a more “normal speech-oriented” formula to begin with. But in practice, this differences between he formulas might be so far apart that it might negate the soundness of this theory.
It makes me wonder how best to address this dilemma? Perhaps do the link for P1 REM changes to MyMusic/HifiMusic, then add another pure/unadulterated MyMusic/HifiMusic in another program, then do A/B comparison between the 2 versions of the music program to see which one you like better, then stick to that version?