Invisible in the canal

Hiya,

I’m 35/M/England.

I’m just curious does anybody have Invisible in the canal hearing aids and do you actually like them?

What are the PROs and CONs ?

I’m looking at spending money on them, and just wanted some personal opinions from actual users.

Thank you in advance.

They’re never truly invisible (with the exception of Phonak’s Lyric series). I’ve been using them for a decade, Widex and Signia.
Switched to behind the ears slim RIC (Signia Stylettos).
They’re still not visible from front and from sides (mostly) but when people do see them, it’s obvious what they are, and I don’t have to explain what is stuck in my ears.
That, and I couldn’t deal with the occlusion effect, blocked ears.
Most of them have limited functionality set compared to their bigger brothers.
I prefer too have rechargable HAs because it removes one more aspect of thinking about my HAs (batteries).
I have been using my Signias for more than a year, and I still don’t know how the warning about low batteries sounds.
Because they’re charged by their box.

2 Likes

Hi, and welcome.

I’ve never had them, and was initially self conscious when getting behind the ear aids in 2009. Nowadays, 3 factors have taken away that anxiety:

  1. They look much more hi-tech now
  2. Nobody notices, or cares
  3. With RIC or thin tubes, you can hardly see them anyway. Some ITE are more noticeable

BTE appear to be less prone to problems, and as they’re custom moulded, more expensive to replace. There’s more room for more features. Whether they are rechargeable, or have replaceable batteries, is generally only a personal choice as features are often the same.

Peter

1 Like

Occlusion might be a real issue depending on your audiogram.

:slight_smile:

1 Like

When I was ready to get my first set of hearing aids, I trialed Lyric (which, as said above, is invisible). There were benefits to them. I liked the idea that others wouldn’t know I had hearing aids. but after trying decided they weren’t for me for reasons of comfort and ongoing cost (they are usually more expensive over time). This wasn’t an issue then, but it would be for me now: there’s no Bluetooth feature with Lyric. Bluetooth helps a lot with hearing other electronic devices such as TV and smartphone. I opted instead for receiver-in-the-canal aids in a case colored as close to my skin tone as offered, and haven’t looked back.

Now that I’m older and wiser, I choose cases that are brightly colored and stand out. I want people to know I have hearing aids (hoping they’ll face me and speak slowly and clearly), and I want aids that will be easier to spot if I’m looking for them (which, granted, isn’t an issue with Lyric; you can’t lose them). Few people notice I have hearing aids anyways; the tubes are hard to see and some who do notice them think they’re smartphone accessories, not hearing aids.

My suggestion is to go with the aids that fit your hearing needs best and don’t worry about how they look to others.

4 Likes

I’ve had both CIC/ITC (I’m not sure which they are, but pretty small) and RIC, and for me there is no comparison - I can’t imagine ever going back to completely in the ear.

When I got my first hearing aids I was in my early 40’s, and was adamant that I wanted an in the ear style because I thought they would be less noticeable. I found them ‘ok’ but I really didn’t have any idea what they should be like. I was definitely hearing sounds that I could not hear without them, my family and co workers could tell the difference immediately, and they did help in a lot of situations. However, there were also a lot of situations where I actually felt that I would be able to hear better and clearer if I didn’t have them in. I mainly felt this way in noisy places, like trying to order in a cafeteria. I also felt very occluded - like my ears were plugged a lot of the time, and no amount of adjusting them (or remaking them even) seemed to help. But I continued to wear them and when I decided to get a new set last year (about 6 years later) I had every intention of going the same route.

However, the one thing that I didn’t like about the ones I had was that there was no connectivity (which was pretty standard at the time) so I couldn’t change the volume or program without the remote. The remote was another device that I had to remember to charge and carry around, so I was hoping a new pair with improved technology would be able to connect to my phone. I wasn’t concerned about streaming, but I was hoping to be able to at least adjust volume (they are too small for buttons). The problem was that in order to get that connectivity, you need an antenna, which on the brands I looked at was very noticeable. My audi said that with my shoulder length hair behind the ear would actually be less visible. I wasn’t sure I believed that, but decided to do a trial. I trialed the oticon Moores, and could not believe the difference - SOO much better! They are way more comfortable - not necessarily more physically comfortable but because I don’t have the ‘stuffed up’ feeling I don’t even notice I am wearing them - I have even gotten in bed and the shower forgetting I have them in, which NEVER happened with my old ones. I also don’t have any situations where I think I would hear better without them. I think that may be because my hearing is still reasonably good, and the RIC HAs ‘aid’ my hearing, instead of blocking my ear and then replacing my hearing if that makes sense. I also find the streaming capability convenient for listening to podcasts or music, even though it wasn’t necessarily something I was looking for. My Moores are a different manufacturer and are about 6 years newer technology so maybe the drastic improvement for me is not totally attributable to the style, but I do think the style has a lot to do with it. However, it will also depend on your loss as well.

4 Likes