I wear Oticon More 1. They sound very natural to me and work great in easy/quiet ambients. However, I was still unable to fully comprehend speech in not so very challenging situations (echoey places, small restaurants, etc.).
To investigate that, I have two programs running side by side, both with the exact same prescription and fitting formula (NAL-NL2). They differ as follows:
- P1 was pretty much as Oticon recommends it to be: “Neural Noise Suppression”, “Transient Noise Management”, “Spatial Noise Management”, and “Feedback Management” all toggled ON; and mics set to “Neural Automatic”.
- P2 went the other direction: “Neural Noise Suppression”, “Transient Noise Management”, “Spatial Noise Management”, and “Feedback Management” all toggled OFF; and mics set to “Fixed Omni”.
My impression is that P2 allows me to have a much easier time understanding people, hearing music in that environment, and being aware of the complete soundscape. On top of that, I was relaxed and not experiencing any sort of discomfort. On the other hand, P1 frequently annoys me with what I perceive as “unnatural” sound behavior, especially noise suppression (that often seems to take a bite of the human voice as well).
Although I still rely on those digital assistive features in more complex situations, I have been using P2 for most of my day and am very happy. IMHO, this is the true embodiment of Oticon’s “brain hearing” or “open sound”…
I post my experience so anyone else struggling to get the best out of these hearing aids could explore that with hers/his hearing care professional. Perhaps I am an outlier, perhaps my brain is a bit odd, or perhaps for my hearing loss less “sound meddling” is more.