I’ve been wearing the Oticon More 1 for about two years now. Recently, I had the chance to trial the Phonak Lumity L90, and I found that my Oticon More aids were slightly better. Now, I’m in my third day of trialing the Oticon Intent 1, and here are my initial impressions:
Companion App:
The Companion App has two EQ options for the Intent 1: “sound equalizer” and “streaming equalizer”. Sound EQ applies to ambient sound and has a range of ± 6 dB for Low, Mid, and High., while the streaming EQ ranges from -12 to + 6 dB. I tried the sound equalizer while playing my acoustic guitar, and it is effective, to the point where I think it could help improve the overall experience for some of us having problems with music. Comparatively, the Oticon More 1 only has the ‘streaming equalizer,’ making this a much anticipated improvement.
Sound EQ
Streaming EQ
Quiet places:
In quiet environments, the difference between the More 1 and Intent 1 is incremental. The sound from the Intents is slightly crisper and richer compared to the Mores, although the difference is not significant.
Noisy and complex places:
I haven’t had the chance to put the Intents to a good test yet. So far, I’ve only used them a couple of times at the gym. I noticed it was easier to understand people with the Intents compared to the Mores. Additionally, the Intents handle noisy streets much better than the Mores. While wearing the Intents, I’m aware of the surrounding noise, but it doesn’t bother me as much as it did with the Mores. This made it easier to communicate with people walking next to me. However, I still need more time to find out whether the Intents are an incremental improvement, or a significant leap compared to the Mores in these challenging situations
Music:
I did an A/B test listening to ‘Everywhere’ by Fleetwood Mac (among other songs) wearing my Beyer DT 900 X over-the-ear headphones. Note that I have the exact same dedicated music program on both Intents and Mores.
The Intents deliver a noticeably more detailed and dynamic sound; they sound livelier and more enjoyable. While the Mores are not bad for music, the Intents offer a higher level of resolution. To use an analogy, it’s like comparing your new glasses with the correct prescription (Intents) to your old ones where you sometimes struggle to see details (Mores). This difference is particularly evident when listening to elements like drums in songs such as ‘Everywhere.’ The Intents bring the beat to the forefront, giving it life, while with the Mores, the drums sound a bit dull and less pronounced. One reason for this could be the Intents’ capacity to better correct for highs in my hearing loss.
Guitar:
I have the exact same dedicated guitar program on both Intents and Mores. I noticed the same difference I mentioned for music. Both are excellent for my acoustic and classical guitars, though the Intents seem to deliver more resolution.
Streaming:
Streaming with the Intents is a bit better. I disabled the ‘power bass’ feature because songs and podcasts were overly bassy for my taste. This wasn’t the case with my Mores, where I had them set with medium bass in the right ear and low bass in the left ear. However, streaming is still not as good as listening to music with my over-the-ear cans and dedicated music program.
Battery:
The battery on the Intents seems to last longer than my Mores did when I first got them. I’ve been wearing the Intents for almost 15 hours a day and still put them back in the charger with around 40% battery left.
Firmware stability:
The Intents definitely need a firmware update to correct some of the bugs I’ve noticed, such as the hearing aids freezing and requiring a hard reset, as well as occasionally going mute when accidentally touched. Connectivity with my iPhone could be better too, although it’s not significantly different from the Mores, to be honest.
That’s it for now. I will report back when I am able to test the Intent in a few challenging situations. So far, so good. It really seems like the Intents are a few steps ahead of the Mores.