Wow, @Volusiano! I’m surprised by this post, as well as by @jim_lewis’, as well!
How can charging regimens this meticulous and intricate as the ones you gentlemen suggest be practical? I know we retired folks are supposed to have time on our hands, but - really - who wants to invest this much to eke out an extra few months from consumable parts whose service life is predictably finite?
Besides, as the industry rides the rechargeable battery curve up, I look forward to a battery change in 3 years or so, because the cells will probably be much better than the current ones (cost isn’t an issue - compare Li-ion replacement to 3 years of disposable batteries).
Speaking of engineering - I’ve always marvelled at how many open/close cycles the disposable battery doors can withstand before they pack it in. Rechargeables have different doors that are clearly engineered to meet different criteria than doors for disposables, and the ability to withstand thousands of open/close cycles is evidently not among them, given that to open the rechargeable door requires a special tool.
Personally, I’d have liked to have been given the choice of rechargeable versus disposable, but maybe the new Polaris chipset needs more current than the disposable battery can supply reliably?
Given the fact, however, that my Oticon More3s actually accomplish the goal of helping me hear better, to the point of being able to function fairly normally (versus my Unitron North Moxi Fit 800s that didn’t), I’m willing to transition to the rechargeable form constraint and wait for battery technology to catch up with the amazing Polaris chipset.
Nothing lasts forever (including me) and I’m certainly not going to be using a significant proportion of my waning years refigerating hearing devices and changing out batteries that were not designed to be thusly handled.
But that is just my personal opinion .
YMMV