The frequency shift by 10 Hz is one of the 3 feedback strategies (beside phase change and gain reduction) invariably used by almost all HA mfgs. But since the OPN S, Oticon has come out with a new feedback technology (called the MoreSound Optimizer) that is supposed to replace the traditional feedback management, and this new feedback technology does not use frequency shifting anymore. However, Oticon left the old feedback management in (called Feedback Shield) and allows it to be used in conjunction with the MoreSound Optimizer for the cases where folks have heavy hearing loss and the Optimizer is not sufficient but the combination of the Optimizer and the Feedback Shield would be sufficient to control feedback.
So the first question to the OP is which feedback management technology his HCP has turned on for him, the new one or both the new and the old? If the old one is used, try to turn it off to see if it helps.
The OP doesn’t show his audiogram in his profile avatar so it’s not clear if the Frequency Lowering technology (called Speech Rescue) is used or not. If yes, then that’s another potential source of frequency transposition where the frequency is lowered into a lower/more audible region to help with high frequencies audibility. So if Speech Rescue is used, then the OP needs to decide whether this is worth having or not in lieu of having deliberate frequency artifacts added to the sound field for better audibility in favor of better speech understanding.
I don’t think that compression really makes any changes to the frequencies of sounds. It only compresses the gain of the sounds according to how loud the volume of the incoming sound it, depending on the person’s hearing loss at each of the frequencies.