Thanks, this definitely helps me understand what test box you were talking about now.
Along the same vein that an HCP runs through the aids they receive from the HA mfgs to verify their operational functionality, Iām sure that the factories also must have already run probably even more thorough testing of the hearing aids before they release them to the HCPs. So I really doubt that failed aids are released to the HCPs. But I guess itās another best practice, like REM is, to run them again through the test box at the HCPās office for a final sanity check.
I donāt know if itās common practice for all HCPs to run all the aids they receive through a test box first. I saw mine just took my aids out of a sealed box that she got from Oticon and just started programming them right there as I sat and watched, so I donāt know if all HCPs do this or not. Maybe itās similar to REM, some do, some donāt.
Regardless of that, I would imagine that no matter how thorough the factories tests are, or the test box tests are, thereās probably some kind of margin for the parameters that if the aids perform within those margins, they get passed and released for sale. But I canāt imagine that the tests from the factories and/or the test box are exhaustive enough, with stringently tight enough margins that all parts released can be expected to perform almost EXACTLY the same with little to no variations in any of the endless possible situations that they can be subjected to.
So thatās why the REM test is the final test on the system as a whole. But I can see your point that the biggest variability should be in the ear canal shapes and not the aids nor the receivers or the fittings. Maybe youāre right, but I donāt know. I think thereās also variability in the hearing aids that can be sufficient enough to add to the discrepancies.
So maybe let us ask the professionals who are participating here who advocate for REM (well @Neville and @gorgeguy so far): ā If your client has a bad hearing aid that needs to be replaced, when you get a new replacement hearing aid in, do you feel the need to run REM again on this new hearing aid? Or do you feel that the previous REM result is good enough because you donāt expect much variability on the replacement hearing aid compared to the old one (assuming that the fitting hasnāt changed)?