I posted about this a few years ago, but I was wondering if anyone new here had any insight. I have an acoustic neuroma in my left ear. It was treated with Gamma Knife 7 years ago, and I was lucky to have been left with some aidable hearing in that ear. However, my hearing in that ear is very weak and distorted.
My right ear, which used to be my worse ear, is now, by far, my better ear. At least there is no distortion in my right ear, although I have a very significant loss in that ear too.
The distortion in my bad ear affects my speech comprehension, especially in noise, and my hearing of music. As a musician, this has greatly impacted my semi-professional career. While I am performing, music at any significant volume from another instrument on stage coming into my bad ear sounds like an atonal roar. I am often unable to recognize a well-known song that is playing as recorded background music at a restaurant.
A few years ago, I trialed Bi-CROS HAs, and I remember liking them. But my audi recommended against me wearing them because my bad ear wouldn’t be getting enough auditory stimulation, and my “brain hearing” could deteriorate.
I am considering buying new HAs, and I am wondering if it would be possible/advisable to try using a regular HA in my bad ear IN ADDITION to a pair of Bi-CROS HAs. I would use some kind of tape to secure the regular HA on my bad side to the Bi-CROS microphone HA on the same bad side. I would, of course, use the Bi-CROS receiving HA on my good side.
The idea would be that, by default, I would be getting audio stimulation to my bad ear in most situations; but when I was performing music or in a challenging listening environment, I could reduce the volume on the regular HA on my bad side and use just the Bi-CROS (maybe with a bump up in volume). Hopefully that would give me increased clarity when I needed it, and the auditory stimulation to my bad ear otherwise. Is this worth a try?
Sorry for the long post, but I thought it was necessary to explain my unusual situation.