Thanks to all responders.
HearingAidHelper - Yes, your post helps! I appreciate the advice and respect your opinion. Since my first post, I’ve been lurking and reading and realize I’ve a lot more to learn.
When one plays with a digital audio workstation (DAW), even as a hobbiest, one becomes familiar with multiband compressors, equalizers, limiters, gates, latency, and the like. Not to mention the intricacies of software controlled parameterization (and the need to protect ones ears from a misstep. Yeah, I know, my specs indicate I didn’t fare well in that dept.
). So yes, that’s one reason I think I’d be relatively comfortable programming my own aids. But I do understand how this line of thinking can, shall we say, go against the grain for professional providers.
Having said that, I’d much prefer the ideal audi experience to home programming ie. where s/he’s sufficiently available, experienced, amiable, and conveniently accessible for multiple tweaking. My explorations so far are not terribly encouraging, but, indeed, I’m still searching for the right provider.
BTW, I think the documentation for the Oticon and Widex software will be quite valuable, not because I intend to use the software right away, but because it will help familiarize me with what the provider will be doing, hence better able to judge how experienced s/he is with that particular brand. So special thanks for pointing toward the “pro” sites.
And general thanks again for a balanced, informative response on what I’m learning is a controversial issue.
-Ron