Neilk
January 25, 2009, 9:46am
22
Lucille:
There’s a lot of moaning and whining when the specific facts are not known. We do not know the extent of the insurance coverance, if it DOES cover the HAs, a jury would raise an eyebrow at a business trying to grab additional funds.
You consider that “moaning and whining” when someone points out the fact that someone took responsibility by signing for just that? You and I were meant to butt heads, eh?
Hask12
January 25, 2009, 10:21am
23
this is exactly why we have rich lawyers
randy2029:
Let’s talk about reasonableness. Is the “vendor” (funny how they don’t advertise themselves as vendors, but as life-changers) really out $2300 for a used loaner HA that is insured?
Look, I wasn’t suggesting that I be absolved of any responsibility. I was just asking for suggestions as to how to resolve this matter, short of trying to dig up $2300 for a product that doesn’t seem to work for me and is used and depreciated in value. The suggestions re: offer to pay for the deductible and their trouble (although I have already paid one bill to them) seem reasonable to me. I am deeply grateful for everyone’s thoughts, and that I found this resource.
If it really was a used loaner HA, why don’t you try to buy one (same manufacturer, same model) from Ebay or from another dispenser as well? This way, the audiologist will not suffer any financial damage.
paul10r
January 28, 2009, 8:35am
25
So randy2029, it has been 2 weeks since your original post. Where are you with this issue? Resolved? Still ongoing?