Audiogram accuracy / second opinions

@withoutwings There are multiple variables that can affect your hearing temporarily. It’s better to do in-situ [via your hearing devices] or REM. Some [most?] fitting softwares have option for more accurate measurements, using 1dB increments [instead 5dB as used in yours] 5dB can give a wider margin of error.

1 Like

Same sort of thing happened to me.

I had a hearing test done by my new hearing aid specialist.
The test showed my hearing was worse than the dispensing audiologist had shown for almost two years. All of a sudden I had an additional 10 to 20 dB loss in hearing. My new hearing aid practitioner detected it. I hear better now since he set up my hearing aids.

1 Like

Sounds like my day for some of hte last two years… So I experimented. I increased the volume of my hearing aids from the time I put them on. I found I was less tired.

I also contacted a person at work (school board) and asked what I should do. She helps children with hearing problems in our schools. She said I needed a good hearing test to establish an accurate audiogram. My dispensing audiologist had politely suggested that I should find someone who could help me more than he had been able to. He was right.

1 Like

I agree that finding the right audiologist is more important than the brand of hearing aids most of the time.

3 Likes

Good point! My ear canals swell up and go down throughout the day, so it seems that one’s hearing could also waver depending on factors like sinus condition, medication or STRESS. I hope withoutwings gets to the bottom of things and shares the resolution.

3 Likes

Are you wearing Costco aids?
Have you told them what you have told us?
Ask for help.

As far as db changes for each frequency back when I had annual physicals where I worked. If we had a 10 db shift on any frequency we were sent out to an audiologist for testing.

1 Like

Thanks!

One was in a small individual booth, and the other one was the large Costco type of booth with the audiologist sitting right next to me.

Yep, am going for a third one this morning: simple tone test only this time but that’s all I need for now to compare.

Yes I have considered this possibility also, as I have raging tinnitus in both ears that is sometimes worse than other days, chronic sinusitis, and also patulous eustachian tubes that can play up sometimes & when they do definitely affect my hearing.

However at my request the Costco audiologist did another quick tone test some weeks later to verify and said it was pretty much the same as the original one she’d done.

1 Like

My hearing will vary due to the time of day, and also I have to be careful as certain foods I eat will make my tinnitus worse.
I have to stay away from wheat, as in bread and desserts, and added sugar even makes it worse.

1 Like

Yes have a single Philips 9040 aid in my left ear. Right is borderline needing correction but for now I’m happy to leave that unaided.

I actually did give my original audiogram to Costco to keep on file when they did their own test for comparison, not sure the audiologist really paid attention to it though; certainly didn’t talk to me about how different it was.

Haven’t suggested to them that I think their testing is inaccurate - yet - as I’ve only just started considering the possibility…

Honestly if I were fitting aids anywhere I would not go by any other audiogram than the one I do. As a fitter I would not have any idea of what or how that audiogram was done.

I do know Costco uses best practices to fit hearing aids. I have a feeling you could go to just about any Costco and get very similar audiogram results. If you didn’t I would expect the difference to be you. You could be ill, tired, anxious or whatever.

Try a different fitter at Costco or try a different Costco. They are human and not all equal at fitting hearing aids. Are you still in the 180 day trial? Give the Rextons a try.

Anyway, good luck with this. Hang in there.

1 Like

UPDATE: Today I went to my local Specsavers for a third opinion/test, and guess what - it’s almost exactly like the original (less severe) one!

So to put them all side-by-side, here is the first one 7 or so months ago @ Amplifon:

Here is the Costco one two months ago:

And here is today’s one @ Specsavers, done with a brand new booth & equipment:

What was really cool was despite this check supposedly being a “quick” free 15 minute one, the audiologist there was so intrigued by my reason for coming in and bringing a Philips hearing aid with me (which they don’t sell there) that she fired up HearSuite on her system and re-programmed my aid - complete with REM adjustment - to fit against the new audiogram so I can actually try it out for a couple of weeks until my next Costco appointment! Think it must have gone for 40 mins in the end, but she didn’t mind at all.

Anyway, it seems I have some legitimate questions to ask my Costco audiologist next time I see her…

6 Likes

Could be a Calibration/transducer fault on the Costco Kit.

Were they all using inserts? Or Headphones?

The 1KHz R on the Costco result ‘looks’ anomalous, but wouldn’t necessarily show a a faulty test unless you’d been previously been tested there.

2 Likes

I was wondering about that.

Original one I can’t remember it was a while ago. Costco I’m pretty sure just headphones, but my memory could be sketchy from back in December. Today was headphones initially but then high frequencies were repeated with inserts.

I will add that for the General program that was configured for me today, I straight away upped the volume by 2.5dB using the app as it was a touch too quiet across the board (despite it being based on the DSL-adult rationale). But since doing that I’m very happy with the sound of the world - it’s comfortable, and it’s well balanced in all environments. A tiny amount of generated mic noise is still audible in a quiet room (somewhere in the higher-frequencies), but it’s much improved compared with before.

1 Like

You bring up some really valid observations here! If one’s chosen aids are to be programmed per a single audiogram, I can see how the outcome would be sub-optimal!

I also seem to do better when the voice-over saying the word comprehension list is FEMALE, for whatever reason. So the nuances of a hearing test are part brain + ear and part equipment used at the hearing test.

3 Likes

As the famous Dr Cliff is fond of saying ‘REM verification etc…’

Unfortunately if you have a duff test, REM isn’t going to provide a ‘catch-all’ for all issues. Especially when your source data is suspect.

Sometimes it comes down to the relative experience of the person doing the testing: having the ‘this doesn’t look quite right?’ question sitting in the back of your brain.

5 Likes

This isn’t quite the answer you are looking for, but may be worth sharing.
Some 40 years ago I noticed that one note on my piano, E6, 1,300 Hz, sounded weak. When eventually I visited a clinic for general hearing loss, the traditional spot frequencies used always missed this dip. A long time later, a different audiologist ran a continuou sweep that immediately found it.

It’s still there, not realistically remediable and not a problem, but perhaps assessments should be
more subtle if only to pick up trouble early and perhaps further alert young folk to the hazards of high spls.

And… it just happens that the old army-tank headphones I used as a kid on my crackly home made radios did peak strongly in that region. Could hurt if I shorted the battery. Maybe blew out specific cochlear hairs… “What did I know in my lamb-white days?”

1 Like

I’ve taken all my audiograms and settings.
Three sources.

  • Peel Audiology (sold business) client for 8 years. One pair of hearing aids
  • CVA client for 1-1/2 years (provided my Phonak Audeo P90R’s)
  • HWM client for 6 months and very happy!

CVA did about 8 hearing tests in the time I was there. All his tests showed my hearing was better than when I was a client at Peel Audiology. I couldn’t hear the way my hearing aids were set up. He suggested I find someone who could help me more and did a quick fit and I left. He erased my programs and setup.

HWM has done 3 hearing tests, starting 6 months after I became a client. When I went there they did a quick fit that was much better than CVA. After 6 months they did a hearing test and 2 followups.
There was an immediate improvement using their audiogram. It gets better with each visit. Their tests show my hearing is 10-20 dB worse than CVA tested.

Test accuracy is so important. The skill of the person doing the setup is key.

Finally, I qualify for hearing aids due to exposure to loud noise at work. Ontario M.O.L. sets standards and maintains cost. Audis work extremely hard to get paid.

1 Like

I was a client at Costco for maybe 10 yrs. The only time the audi had any problem was when there was a problem with the HA. The company rep could not fix them either. The Resound Costco is selling now are the Nexia 9 rebranded - which according to everything I read, are #1 rated in many forums. COST = $1699./pair. I have not gotten those because my Medicare Advantage $2500. HA benefit doesn’t reimburse, it must be used at Nations Hearing. The Nexia 9 there would cost me $5000. WITH the benefit applied. So, I opted to go to the VA. Oticon Real 1 at no cost except visit copays. Unfortunately, the Nexia 9s won’t be on their list until May 24 since they were released in Nov 23. The update their contracts in May and Nov. Just missed it. By then I think the Oticon Intent will also be available since they were released this month. Maybe the VA will swap them out for me in May.

Across 30 years, six generations of HA and about 15 audiology encounters, two steps forward stand out: the clinician who fed a microphone to the hearing aids and TALKED, and one who recently invited me to play a little keyboard while she adjusted the aids - extending below 100Hz.
Single-tone threshold testing from 250 up has its place but…

1 Like